Sunday, 23 September 2012

Response to narrative: Porphyria's Lover


Response to narrative: Porphyria’s Lover.

Robert Browning, author and narrator of the story, is known for his dramatic monologues in the form of poetry, and ‘Porphyria’s Lover’ is one of his well known ones. The pattern of the poem has an ‘A,B,A,B,B’ rhythm; and has four stresses to a line- known as ‘iambic tetrameter’. From the title, we gain the knowledge that Porphyria has a ‘lover’, whether that may be someone that she is having an affair with, or is a way of saying ‘wife’ in a loose context; it is not clear, so it could be either, or simply just a fling with the man describing her. The poem comes across as being very descriptive and begs a lot of questions throughout. Why does he not respond when she ‘call’d’ him? Why does she submit whilst he ‘debated’ what to do; and eventually concludes strangling her is the answer? Why is ‘God not saying a word’ relevant to how he feels? The large description associated with Porphyria about her actions, how she made him feel just by entering, how she ‘murmured’ I love you, how he uses the word ‘to-night’ gives the impression that they have a lot of confused history together. I think he is unsure of his own actions, but they both knew it would end in death eventually. He has a ‘sudden’ thought, but still ‘debates’ what to do, and they do not ‘stir’ all night; showing his content with what he has done. I think the line that sums up the whole poem is line 26; ‘but passion sometimes would prevail’...showing their relationship, why and in what way he killed her, how he can be sure that ‘she felt no pain’.

Wednesday, 12 September 2012

when I woke up, the knife was still there...

'When I woke up, the knife was still there'

As a narrative: I think that the length of this narrative does not detract at all from the overall piece, and the tension that builds up in it. The narrative does not give the reader any clues to the background/ future, leaving a lot to the reader's imafination about what has/ will happen(ed) to 'the knife.'
Analytical Break down:
As a reader: The narrative does not include; a spesific setting, character, plot, explanation or resolution; which makes it a lot harder for the reader to comprehend, as they are often used to narratives coming to a clean conclusion - rather than leaving the reader to try and imagine the stereotypical 'beginning, middle and end' that a lot of narratives posses. I think that it is good to have a change of scenery; with a narrative that is not written, but imagined - however it does help for people who like the full story (often like me) to have that.